Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Lefkowitz Competition 2007-08

During the April 2007 selection window, 6 students were selected to represent Gonzaga in the coming year's Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition. They are:

Kim Burkland
Kent Doll
Erik Lamb
Collette Leland
Brett Venn (returning from last year's Western Region 3rd Place Overall/2nd Place Brief team)
Peter Wilburn

Up to two additional team members will be selected during early September, as which point the teams will be complete, and we'll be off and running.

This year, the teams will have more support than ever, because the IP firm of Lee & Hayes has generously offered to fund the 2007-08 teams. Like other Spokane IP attorneys, they have been extremely supportive of Lefkowitz over the last several years, but this has taken their support to a whole new level, for which we are extremely grateful.

SJE

Labels:

Sunday, April 15, 2007

New GIPLA Board

The Gonzaga Intellectual Property Law Association is pleased to announce the new 2007-08 board:

President - Steve Kirby
Vice President - Kristina Glover
Secretary - Sean Currie
Treasurer - Dan Batten

Congratulations to all.

Labels: ,

Gonzaga Law Intellectual Property Courses

The Gonzaga Law School has revamped and expanded the curriculum for IP courses, effective this coming school year. There are five new advanced classes offered, along with the requisite Intellectual Property survey course. Shown below are the different classes offered and a brief description. Specific questions about courses should be directed to the law school registrar.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Prerequisites: All first-year courses
Credits: 3
Offered: Annually-Fall
Instructor: Professor Engelken

This course provides a general survey of the domestic legal protections available for intellectual property, focusing upon the key areas of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret. The elements of infringement claims, defenses and remedies will be examined, as will the interaction between the federal intellectual property statutes and competition law. The course will also consider the policies underlying the laws of intellectual property and the ways in which organizations and businesses can protect their intellectual property.

ADVANCED COPYRIGHT LAW
Prerequisite: Intellectual Property
Credits: 3
Offered: Annually-Fall
Instructor: Professor Farid

This course builds upon the concepts of copyright law addressed in the Intellectual Property survey course. Using the Copyright Act of 1976 (as amended), the course examines the requirements for copyright protection, the works which may be afforded copyright protection, and the scope of rights enjoyed by copyright owners, in addition to the particulars of registration, notice, copyright term, ownership, licensing and assignment. The course also focuses on the doctrine of fair use and discusses other existing and proposed rights for users of copyrighted material, as well as the theories behind and policy considerations for these rights. Issues relating to the First Amendment, competition law, the Internet and international copyright law are incorporated throughout the course.

INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
Prerequisite: Intellectual Property
Credits: 3
Offered: Annually-Spring
Instructor: Professor Farid

This course, a follow-up to the Intellectual Property survey course, provides an understanding of the processes for acquiring and maintaining intellectual property rights across national borders as well as the regulations for and issues concerning the enforcement of those rights. Students will examine the key international conventions and agreements governing rights in copyright, trademark and patent, discuss states’ compliance with the obligations imposed by those agreements, and review the ongoing effort toward harmonization of intellectual property laws. Students will also explore the significance of intellectual property laws in the realms of international trade and international human rights, including the role of the World Trade Organization, the consequences of international piracy, and related human rights issues concerning traditional knowledge and biodiversity.

ADVANCED TRADEMARK & UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW
Prerequisite: Intellectual Property
Credits: 2
Offered: Annually
Instructor: Professors Lynch and Keyes

This course builds upon the Intellectual Property survey course, using the Lanham Act to address the adoption, registration, maintenance and enforcement of trademarks; false advertising, dilution, counterfeiting and other aspects of unfair competition; and the relevant defenses and available remedies. Students will be introduced to the advantages of federal trademark protection and will learn key aspects of practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, including trademark prosecution and the handling of opposition, cancellation and concurrent use proceedings. Measures for international protection, including the Madrid Protocol, are covered, as are issues of branding and domain name protection. Rights in trademark at common law and the state law right of publicity are addressed.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY - TRANSACTIONS & LICENSING
Prerequisite: Intellectual Property
Credits: 2
Offered: Annually
Instructor: Professors Daggett and Stulberg

This course, building on the Intellectual Property survey course, examines the transactional components of intellectual property practice, including the negotiation of licenses. The course will explore the acquisition and maintenance of Intellectual Property rights under federal law; introduce students to the concepts, laws, and business of intellectual property licensing, and give students the opportunity to analyze and draft several different types of license agreements. The course is designed to be useful not only for students interested in pursuing careers in intellectual property law but also those whose practice will involve working with transactional business clients.

PATENT PROSECUTION & LITIGATION
Prerequisite: Intellectual Property
Credits: 2
Offered: Annually
Instructor: Professor Sadler

A follow-up to the Intellectual Property survey course, this course provides an in-depth examination of the practice of patent law. The course will focus on the legal issues that arise in the patent application process, post-issuance review of patent validity, the litigation of patent cases, and the interplay between patent prosecution and litigation. Students will be introduced to the drafting of patent applications and to the issues and considerations that arise in the prosecution of patents before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. The specialized arena of patent litigation will also be covered, including issues such as infringement, validity, and the claim construction; preliminary injunction practice, damages, and appeals; and the role of expert witnesses. The relationship between patent prosecution and litigation is such that an understanding of one permits a more thorough understanding of the other. For that reason, this course is intended not only for students with technical backgrounds who intend to take the Patent Bar, but also for those students interested in pursuing a career in patent litigation, for whom a technical background is not required.

Labels:

Thursday, March 1, 2007

Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition

Please join me in congratulating the Gonzaga students who participated in the Saul Lefkowitz Moot Court Competition in San Francisco over the weekend.

Team DB: Lauren Altdoerffer, Keith Echterling, Dan Quirk, & Brett Venn

Team DD: Nguyen Do, Kristina Glover, Trent Hooper & Brent Underwood

Both teams delivered outstanding oral arguments, better even than any of their practice presentations. As a result of their hard work and diligent preparation, they faced no new questions or arguments in San Francisco, and were on top of all issues. Not surprising in light of their performances, our students received much praise from the judges during post-argument critiques.

After all the scores were tallied, Team DB received two awards: Second Place Oral Argument Team and Third Place Team Overall Brief and Oral Argument. Team DB beat both Berkeley teams this year in the oral argument competition – something Gonzaga had not previously accomplished. Other Intellectual Property powerhouses that Team DB bested were UC-Davis, Santa Clara, UW, and USF.

This was a great showing for Gonzaga, and both teams enhanced the reputation of the Law School in the IP community.

Labels:

Monday, February 19, 2007

Intellectual Property Organizations

A student may want to join a professional intellectual property organization in order to gain a greater understanding of the professional IP world. It also provides an opportunity to get to know some of the IP practitioners in the area.

National Organizations:

American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA):
Benefits of membership include regular mailings of IP events, including employment events. Also, there are regular mailings on current IP topics, quarterly law-review-type journals, annual AIPLA reviews, and more. Most events take place in larger cities such as Chicago or Los Angeles. Membership for students is $45. Good opportunity to be exposed to a lot of regular IP information.

American Bar Association IP Law Section (ABA IPL):
This is another organization that holds regular conferences in larger cities such as Arlington, VA and San Francisco. Members receive regular mailings on legislative news, the quarterly IPL newsletter, notice of IP events, and discounts on CLEs and publications. Enrollment with the ABA for students is $20.

Local Organizations:

Washington State Bar Association IP Section (WSBA IP):
There are CLEs nearly every month, with some available with scholarships to GIPLA members and some cheap enough at $25 to attend on your own. Most CLEs are held in Seattle, but there is a CLE held in Spokane in the fall, freely available to two GIPLA members. Yearly membership in this section is only $15. Current president is Gonzaga Professor Mike Keyes.

Spokane County Bar Association IP Section (SCBA IP):
IP Practitioners from Spokane County gather to meet regularly, including at an annual luncheon. Membership is $25 per year. Current president is Gonzaga Professor David Daggett. Good opportunity for students to network with local practitioners.

Labels:

Sunday, February 18, 2007

Patent Bar Information

General Information:

Students interested in becoming a patent attorney may want to take the USPTO Qualification Examination (Patent Bar) before completing law school. Taking and passing the exam enables one to register as a “patent agent” and prosecute patents with the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). Prosecuting patents simply means being able to write and submit patent applications through the USPTO, which only registered patent agents, patent attorneys, or inventors who submit their own patent applications are allowed to do.

The Patent Bar does not require the applicant to have graduated law school or to be in the field of law at all. The basic requirement is that the applicant has a science or engineering degree, although there are options that will qualify an applicant who has a certain number of science/engineering credits. See the General Requirements Bulletin (PDF, p.4-8) for all of the specific qualification information. Please note that the listed option to qualify by way of practical scientific or engineering experience is virtually never accepted.

Applicants register through the Office of Enrollment and Discipline and pay a $40 non-refundable application fee and $200 registration fee. A $150 fee must be paid to Thompson Prometric to administer the exam once an applicant has been accepted. Total costs to take the patent bar exam: $390. Once an exam taker passes the exam, registering as a patent agent or attorney costs an additional $300.

Registration typically takes three weeks for the USPTO to accept or reject an application. Upon acceptance, an exam taker has a 90-day window in which to take the exam. If you fail the exam, you are eligible to re-register (along with fees) after 30 days and take the exam again as many times as necessary.

In Spokane, computerized tests are administered at the Sylvan Learning Center in North Spokane, with multiple test dates available each month. The exam lasts six hours and is separated into two 3-hour sessions with a 1-hour break in-between. Written exams are available only once a year, usually in Washington D.C., and cost $250 more than computerized exams.

What the Exam Encompasses:

The exam consists of 100 multiple-choice questions, 90 of which are graded. The 10 non-graded questions are beta questions and are interspersed throughout the test. The 90 graded questions all have been used in previous exams. An exam-taker must correctly answer 70% (sixty three) of the ninety scored questions in order to pass. The typical pass rate each year hovers around a mere 50%. However, this may have more to do with a lack of preparation than with the difficulty of the exam.

The exam itself is not based so much on knowing law as it is on knowing the procedure used to prosecute a patent. This procedure is detailed in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP). A searchable version of the MPEP is available for the computerized exams, which is helpful considering the MPEP is over 3,000 pages.

Topics on the exam range from knowing the different parts of a patent (i.e. drawings, specification, and claims), how to properly form different types of claims (e.g. Jepson claim, multiple dependent claims, etc.), claim terminology, patentability, all of the different types of non-provisional applications, prior art, objections/amendments/rejections/appeals, and many other topics. In addition, parts of 35 USC and 37 CFR code sections must be understood and much of it memorized. With such a vast amount of material to cover, it is highly recommended that an exam taker use study aids in order to prepare.

Studying for the Exam:

Since all of the scored questions have been used in past examinations, it is essential that an exam taker go through as many past exams as possible. The USPTO has access to a few past exams and answers on their website, but other resources such as Lawprofessor.org contains archives to many more past exams.

Of course, just going through past exams is not enough to understand all of the material of the MPEP. It is almost certainly necessary to use a study guide to prepare for the exam. Many different review courses exist, but the most highly recommended are ones sold by PRG and PLI (which also happen to be some of the most expensive). Listed below is a list of a few of the different study aids. Please contact these companies if you have specific questions about what they are offering.

*Patent Resources Group (PRG): Professor Kayton’s review course consists of 46 hours of instructional video along with lecture charts to follow along with. The materials also include Patent Practice volumes that are helpful for practicing before the USPTO, two-thousand exam questions and answers, software to simulate an exam, printed and electronic forms of the MPEP, and Kayton’s treatise on how to pass the patent bar. In-person classes are also available in select cities. Price: $2,690.

*Practicing Law Institute (PLI): PLI also offers home study or live courses in select cities. The home study course includes video and audio lectures, an exam simulator, the MPEP, and multiple volumes of study materials. Contact PLI for more details. Price for students: $1,795.

*Other patent review courses:
Patbar.com Review Course: Price: $795.
BAR/BRI Patent Review Course: Price for students: $1,895.
Pass the Patent Bar with Jim Longacre: Price: $1,295.

Given the extraordinary cost of some of these courses, an exam taker may want to consider buying discounted used materials through a medium such as eBay.

Typically, the time required to devote to studying for the exam is around 150 hours, or four weeks. Others recommend 15-20 hours per week of studying over three months to fully prepare. However, the real gauge of whether you are ready to take the exam depends on if you can take two practice exams in an exam setting and get 80% correct or better. Then you are ready to register and take the real exam.

All of the information presented above is used only to help a student form a basis of what is required to take the patent bar exam. More information is available from online sources or by asking someone who has taken the patent bar (and passed).

Labels: ,

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Cisco Systems v. Apple, Inc.

The news has been full lately of reports about Cisco's lawsuit in federal court in the Northern District of California challenging Apple's use of the trademark "iPhone" for Apple's new all-in-one device.

If you want to see the actual complaint, here's the link: http://news.com.com/i/ne/pdfs/2007ciscovapple.pdf. The link shows not just the text of the complaint, but also the exhibits.

Once Apple files a substantive response, I'll try to supply a link for that, too.

SJE

Labels: ,